Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GSIE vs JHEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF vs John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF

GSIE

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$5.8B

JHEM

John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF

Annual cost

0.49%

Fund size

$1.0B

Key differences

Both GSIE and JHEM are equity ETFs. GSIE charges 0.25% a year and JHEM 0.49%. The main difference: GSIE follows a index enhanced strategy; JHEM uses index tracking.

  • GSIE follows a index enhanced strategy; JHEM uses index tracking.
  • GSIE covers global markets excluding the US; JHEM covers emerging markets.
  • GSIE costs 0.24% less per year.
  • GSIE is much larger than JHEM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, JHEM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

GSIEJHEM
Annual cost (TER)0.25%0.49%
Fund size (AUM)$5.8B$1.0B
Since20152018
Dividend yield2.49%1.93%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobal ex usemerging markets
Strategyindex enhancedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+17.8%+41.9%
CAGR 3Y+16.9%+20.8%
CAGR 5Y+8.0%+6.9%
Sharpe 3Y0.890.97
Volatility 1Y14.33%19.79%
Max drawdown-34.63%-34.99%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GSIE and JHEM