Screener
GTO vs HCRB
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF vs Hartford Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- HCRB costs 0.06% less per year.
- GTO is significantly larger than HCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTO follows a active selection strategy; HCRB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTO | HCRB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $360M |
| Since | 2016 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 4.18% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +4.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | 3.85% |
| Max drawdown | -20.75% | -19.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTO and HCRB
Explore further