Screener
HFGO vs RPG
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG costs 0.24% less per year.
- RPG is significantly larger than HFGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFGO follows a active selection strategy; RPG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HFGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGO | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $181M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +36.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.5% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.94% | 19.62% |
| Max drawdown | -44.64% | -36.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGO and RPG
Explore further