Screener
HIMU vs FCOR
iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF vs Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
Both HIMU and FCOR are fixed income ETFs. HIMU charges 0.39% a year and FCOR 0.36%. The main difference: HIMU follows a active selection strategy; FCOR uses index tracking.
- HIMU follows a active selection strategy; FCOR uses index tracking.
- HIMU is much larger than FCOR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- HIMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HIMU | FCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $342M |
| Since | 2006 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 5.14% | 4.54% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.8% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.58% | 4.39% |
| Max drawdown | -8.01% | -22.60% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.