Screener
HIMU vs FMUN
iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF vs Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF
Key differences
Both HIMU and FMUN are fixed income ETFs. HIMU charges 0.39% a year and FMUN 0.05%. The main difference: HIMU follows a active selection strategy; FMUN uses index tracking.
- HIMU follows a active selection strategy; FMUN uses index tracking.
- FMUN costs 0.34% less per year.
- HIMU is much larger than FMUN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- HIMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HIMU | FMUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $181M |
| Since | 2006 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 5.14% | 3.30% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.8% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.58% | 3.11% |
| Max drawdown | -8.01% | -3.21% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.