Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

HTAX vs PWER

Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF vs Nomura Energy Transition ETF

HTAX

Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.49%

Fund size

$57M

PWER

Nomura Energy Transition ETF

Annual cost

0.80%

Fund size

$13M

Key differences

HTAX is a fixed income ETF, while PWER is an equity ETF. HTAX charges 0.49% a year and PWER 0.80%.

  • HTAX is a fixed income fund, while PWER is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • HTAX follows a active selection strategy; PWER uses index tracking.
  • HTAX costs 0.31% less per year.
  • HTAX is much larger than PWER. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

HTAXPWER
Annual cost (TER)0.49%0.80%
Fund size (AUM)$57M$13M
Since20252023
Dividend yield4.50%1.07%
Asset classfixed incomeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+9.0%+60.8%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y4.70%20.72%
Max drawdown-6.10%-29.67%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to HTAX and PWER