Screener
IGF vs INRO
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- IGF is significantly larger than INRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF covers global markets; INRO covers north america.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | INRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $31M |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 0.69% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.43% | 12.92% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -20.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and INRO
Explore further