Screener
IMOM vs EZMO
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF vs Alphadroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF
Key differences
- IMOM costs 0.45% less per year.
- IMOM is significantly larger than EZMO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMOM covers global markets; EZMO covers north america.
- IMOM follows a active selection strategy; EZMO uses index tracking.
- IMOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMOM | EZMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.83% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $153M | $16M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.19% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.42% | — |
| Max drawdown | -45.74% | -9.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMOM and EZMO
Explore further