Screener
IMTG vs VRP
Invesco Agency MBS ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- IMTG costs 0.28% less per year.
- VRP is significantly larger than IMTG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMTG follows a active selection strategy; VRP uses index tracking.
- VRP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMTG | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2026 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.39% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.87% |
| Max drawdown | -2.86% | -46.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMTG and VRP
Explore further