Screener
INKM vs AOM
State Street Income Allocation ETF vs iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOM costs 0.35% less per year.
- AOM is significantly larger than INKM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INKM follows a active selection strategy; AOM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| INKM | AOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2012 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.88% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.1% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.98% | 6.55% |
| Max drawdown | -28.58% | -19.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INKM and AOM
Explore further