Screener
INTL vs DFIV
Main International ETF vs Dimensional International Value ETF
Key differences
- DFIV costs 0.57% less per year.
- DFIV is significantly larger than INTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while DFIV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL covers global markets; DFIV covers global ex us.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; DFIV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DFIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | DFIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $19.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 1999 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | 13.72% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -25.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and DFIV
Explore further