Screener
INTL vs EMBX
Main International ETF vs VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMBX costs 0.08% less per year.
- INTL is classified as alternative, while EMBX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; EMBX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, INTL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | EMBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $244M |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 5.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | 5.94% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -37.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and EMBX
Explore further