Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

INTL vs FLXR

Main International ETF vs TCW Flexible Income ETF

INTL

Main International ETF

Annual cost

0.84%

Fund size

$233M

FLXR

TCW Flexible Income ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$3.2B

Key differences

INTL is an alternative ETF, while FLXR is a fixed income ETF. INTL charges 0.84% a year and FLXR 0.40%.

  • INTL is an alternative fund, while FLXR is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • INTL follows a option income strategy; FLXR uses active selection.
  • INTL covers global markets excluding the US; FLXR covers global markets.
  • FLXR costs 0.44% less per year.
  • FLXR is much larger than INTL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

INTLFLXR
Annual cost (TER)0.84%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$233M$3.2B
Since20222018
Dividend yield2.31%5.71%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionglobal ex usglobal
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1Y+23.0%+5.5%
CAGR 3Y+16.8%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.84N/A
Volatility 1Y15.82%2.28%
Max drawdown-14.48%-1.94%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to INTL and FLXR