Screener
IOO vs CGGO
iShares Global 100 ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- IOO costs 0.07% less per year.
- IOO follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IOO | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.5B | $10.1B |
| Since | 2000 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.8% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.1% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.63% | 16.59% |
| Max drawdown | -31.43% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IOO and CGGO
Explore further