Screener
ISBG vs AAAU
IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF vs Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
Key differences
ISBG is an alternative ETF, while AAAU is a commodity ETF. ISBG charges 1.14% a year and AAAU 0.18%.
- ISBG is an alternative fund, while AAAU is a commodity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- AAAU costs 0.96% less per year.
- AAAU is much larger than ISBG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAAU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISBG | AAAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.14% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2026 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | commodity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | — |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +29.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 26.58% |
| Max drawdown | -49.42% | -21.63% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.