Screener
ISBG vs EPRF
IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF vs Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF
Key differences
ISBG is an alternative ETF, while EPRF is a fixed income ETF. ISBG charges 1.14% a year and EPRF 0.47%.
- ISBG is an alternative fund, while EPRF is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ISBG follows a active selection strategy; EPRF uses structured outcome.
- EPRF costs 0.67% less per year.
- EPRF is much larger than ISBG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPRF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISBG | EPRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.14% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $71M |
| Since | 2026 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +1.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +2.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.54% |
| Max drawdown | -49.42% | -26.82% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.