Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ISBG vs RING

IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

ISBG

IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF

Annual cost

1.14%

Fund size

$5M

RING

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$2.8B

Key differences

ISBG is an alternative ETF, while RING is an equity ETF. ISBG charges 1.14% a year and RING 0.39%.

  • ISBG is an alternative fund, while RING is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • ISBG follows a active selection strategy; RING uses index tracking.
  • ISBG covers North America; RING covers global markets.
  • RING costs 0.75% less per year.
  • RING is much larger than ISBG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RING has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ISBGRING
Annual cost (TER)1.14%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$5M$2.8B
Since20262012
Dividend yield0.79%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americaglobal
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+55.3%
CAGR 3YN/A+42.7%
CAGR 5YN/A+17.6%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.03
Volatility 1Y46.72%
Max drawdown-49.42%-52.04%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ISBG and RING