Screener
ISCV vs FFSM
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF vs Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- ISCV follows a index tracking strategy; FFSM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISCV | FFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $651M | — |
| Since | 2004 | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.90% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +37.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.7% | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.48% | 17.99% |
| Max drawdown | -51.56% | -26.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISCV and FFSM
Explore further