Screener
ISMF vs PFUT
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
Key differences
ISMF is an alternative ETF, while PFUT is an equity ETF. ISMF charges 0.80% a year and PFUT 0.64%.
- ISMF is an alternative fund, while PFUT is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; PFUT uses active selection.
- ISMF covers global markets; PFUT covers North America.
- PFUT costs 0.16% less per year.
- ISMF is much larger than PFUT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $59M | $4M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.49% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | managed futures | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.7% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.99% | 16.31% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -44.85% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.