Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ISSB vs BINC

IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

ISSB

IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF

Annual cost

1.14%

Fund size

$2M

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.8B

Key differences

ISSB is an alternative ETF, while BINC is a fixed income ETF. ISSB charges 1.14% a year and BINC 0.40%.

  • ISSB is an alternative fund, while BINC is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • ISSB follows a option income strategy; BINC uses active selection.
  • BINC costs 0.74% less per year.
  • BINC is much larger than ISSB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

ISSBBINC
Annual cost (TER)1.14%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$16.8B
Since20262023
Dividend yield5.54%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1YN/A+5.4%
CAGR 3YN/A+7.0%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.07
Volatility 1Y2.28%
Max drawdown-30.57%-2.69%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ISSB and BINC