Screener
IWB vs FEAC
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- IWB is significantly larger than FEAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | FEAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $12M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 12.61% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -18.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWB and FEAC
Explore further