Screener
IXUS vs RIFR
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.52% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXUS covers global ex us markets; RIFR covers global.
- IXUS follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- IXUS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXUS | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56.2B | $42M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.94% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.9% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.28% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -36.22% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXUS and RIFR
Explore further