Screener
JGRW vs IDHQ
Jensen Quality Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF
Key differences
- IDHQ costs 0.28% less per year.
- IDHQ is significantly larger than JGRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JGRW covers north america markets; IDHQ covers global.
- JGRW follows a active selection strategy; IDHQ uses index tracking.
- IDHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| JGRW | IDHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $100M | $741M |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 2.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.78% | 18.42% |
| Max drawdown | -14.63% | -33.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JGRW and IDHQ
Explore further