Screener
KAT vs CCNR
Scharf ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
Both KAT and CCNR are equity ETFs. KAT charges 0.75% a year and CCNR 0.39%. The main difference: CCNR costs 0.36% less per year.
- CCNR costs 0.36% less per year.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $682M | $393M |
| Since | 2011 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +61.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.44% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -20.06% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.