Screener
KAT vs DFIV
Scharf ETF vs Dimensional International Value ETF
Key differences
- DFIV costs 0.48% less per year.
- DFIV is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | DFIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $19.3B |
| Since | 2011 | 1999 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.72% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -25.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and DFIV
Explore further