Screener
KONG vs ABFL
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Abacus FCF Leaders ETF
Key differences
KONG is an alternative ETF, while ABFL is an equity ETF. KONG charges 0.89% a year and ABFL 0.49%.
- KONG is an alternative fund, while ABFL is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; ABFL uses active selection.
- ABFL costs 0.40% less per year.
- ABFL is much larger than KONG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ABFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ABFL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | ABFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $520M |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.54% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.50 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.92% | 15.63% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -34.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.