Screener
KONG vs IQLT
Formidable Fortress ETF vs iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
- IQLT costs 0.59% less per year.
- IQLT is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while IQLT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; IQLT uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IQLT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IQLT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | IQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $12.9B |
| Since | 2021 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 2.16% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 14.47% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -32.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and IQLT
Explore further