Screener
KONG vs VOTE
Formidable Fortress ETF vs TCW Transform 500 ETF
Key differences
KONG is an alternative ETF, while VOTE is an equity ETF. KONG charges 0.89% a year and VOTE 0.05%.
- KONG is an alternative fund, while VOTE is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; VOTE uses index tracking.
- VOTE costs 0.84% less per year.
- VOTE is much larger than KONG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, VOTE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | VOTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.50 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.92% | 12.40% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -25.70% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.