Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

LODI vs PFLD

AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF vs AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF

LODI

AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$83M

PFLD

AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$426M

Key differences

Both LODI and PFLD are fixed income ETFs. LODI charges 0.15% a year and PFLD 0.45%. The main difference: LODI follows a active selection strategy; PFLD uses index tracking.

  • LODI follows a active selection strategy; PFLD uses index tracking.
  • LODI costs 0.30% less per year.
  • PFLD is much larger than LODI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • PFLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

LODIPFLD
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.45%
Fund size (AUM)$83M$426M
Since20242019
Dividend yield4.98%5.61%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+5.8%+5.4%
CAGR 3YN/A+5.0%
CAGR 5YN/A+1.0%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.27
Volatility 1Y2.41%3.38%
Max drawdown-1.02%-33.20%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to LODI and PFLD