Screener
LST vs RFFC
Leuthold Select Industries ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
Both LST and RFFC are equity ETFs. LST charges 0.65% a year and RFFC 0.48%. The main difference: RFFC costs 0.17% less per year.
- RFFC costs 0.17% less per year.
- LST is much larger than RFFC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- LST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LST | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $171M | $30M |
| Since | 2000 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.9% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.61% | 12.25% |
| Max drawdown | -19.47% | -36.26% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.