Screener
LST vs SMMD
Leuthold Select Industries ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Key differences
- SMMD costs 0.50% less per year.
- SMMD is significantly larger than LST — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LST follows a active selection strategy; SMMD uses index tracking.
- LST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LST | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $150M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2000 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.8% | +36.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.38% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -19.47% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LST and SMMD
Explore further