Screener
MAGO vs YYY
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs Amplify CEF High Income ETF
Key differences
- MAGO costs 2.24% less per year.
- YYY is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while YYY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; YYY uses index tracking.
- YYY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | YYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 3.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $712M |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 12.48% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.53% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -42.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and YYY
Explore further