Screener
MAVF vs DFIS
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Dimensional International Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- DFIS costs 0.36% less per year.
- DFIS is significantly larger than MAVF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAVF | DFIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $5.6B |
| Since | 1996 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 2.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.0% | +31.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.06% | 14.54% |
| Max drawdown | -14.87% | -27.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAVF and DFIS
Explore further