Screener
MAVF vs DXIV
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF
Key differences
- DXIV costs 0.45% less per year.
- MAVF follows a active selection strategy; DXIV uses index tracking.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAVF | DXIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $143M |
| Since | 1996 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 2.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.0% | +32.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.06% | 13.55% |
| Max drawdown | -14.87% | -13.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAVF and DXIV
Explore further