Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEM vs APIE

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF vs ActivePassive International Equity ETF

MEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$53M

APIE

ActivePassive International Equity ETF

Active Passive Funds

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$1.0B

Key differences

  • APIE costs 0.34% less per year.
  • APIE is significantly larger than MEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, MEM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMAPIE
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.45%
Fund size (AUM)$53M$1.0B
Since20222023
Dividend yield3.06%3.51%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobal
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+52.4%+22.7%
CAGR 3Y+23.2%+17.2%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.040.82
Volatility 1Y20.59%16.13%
Max drawdown-19.10%-15.94%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MEM and APIE