Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEMX vs APUE

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

APUE

ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF

Active Passive Funds

Annual cost

0.31%

Fund size

$2.4B

Key differences

  • APUE costs 0.48% less per year.
  • APUE is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MEMX covers emerging markets markets; APUE covers north america.
  • Over the last 3 years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMXAPUE
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.31%
Fund size (AUM)$45M$2.4B
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.72%0.79%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+62.2%+30.2%
CAGR 3Y+25.6%+22.9%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.201.24
Volatility 1Y21.07%12.36%
Max drawdown-19.27%-18.83%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MEMX and APUE