Screener
MJ vs COWS
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF vs Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
Key differences
MJ is an equity ETF, while COWS is an alternative ETF. MJ charges 0.75% a year and COWS 0.19%.
- MJ is an equity fund, while COWS is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MJ follows a index tracking strategy; COWS uses option income.
- COWS costs 0.56% less per year.
- MJ is much larger than COWS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- MJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MJ | COWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $134M | $34M |
| Since | 2015 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | 1.60% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.3% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -3.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -33.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 86.87% | 16.17% |
| Max drawdown | -95.81% | -24.75% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.