Screener
MJ vs DIVO
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF vs Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
MJ is an equity ETF, while DIVO is an alternative ETF. MJ charges 0.75% a year and DIVO 0.56%.
- MJ is an equity fund, while DIVO is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MJ follows a index tracking strategy; DIVO uses option income.
- DIVO costs 0.19% less per year.
- DIVO is much larger than MJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, DIVO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MJ | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $134M | $7.1B |
| Since | 2015 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | 1.60% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.3% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -3.9% | +15.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -33.0% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.20 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 86.87% | 9.09% |
| Max drawdown | -95.81% | -30.04% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.