Screener
MJ vs HCOW
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF vs Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
Key differences
MJ is an equity ETF, while HCOW is an alternative ETF. MJ charges 0.75% a year and HCOW 0.65%.
- MJ is an equity fund, while HCOW is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MJ follows a index tracking strategy; HCOW uses option income.
- HCOW costs 0.10% less per year.
- MJ is much larger than HCOW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- MJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MJ | HCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $134M | $17M |
| Since | 2015 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | 11.72% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.3% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -3.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -33.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 86.87% | 13.86% |
| Max drawdown | -95.81% | -24.15% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.