Screener
MJ vs IDVO
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF vs Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
MJ is an equity ETF, while IDVO is an alternative ETF. MJ charges 0.75% a year and IDVO 0.65%.
- MJ is an equity fund, while IDVO is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MJ follows a index tracking strategy; IDVO uses option income.
- IDVO costs 0.10% less per year.
- IDVO is much larger than MJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IDVO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MJ | IDVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $134M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2015 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | 5.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.3% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | -3.9% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -33.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.20 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 86.87% | 15.99% |
| Max drawdown | -95.81% | -15.46% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.