Screener
MJ vs QDVO
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF vs Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
MJ is an equity ETF, while QDVO is an alternative ETF. MJ charges 0.75% a year and QDVO 0.56%.
- MJ is an equity fund, while QDVO is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MJ follows a index tracking strategy; QDVO uses option income.
- QDVO costs 0.19% less per year.
- QDVO is much larger than MJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- MJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MJ | QDVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $134M | $731M |
| Since | 2015 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | 10.05% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.3% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -3.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -33.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 86.87% | 12.46% |
| Max drawdown | -95.81% | -17.75% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.