Screener
MOOD vs RULE
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- MOOD costs 1.11% less per year.
- MOOD is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, MOOD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOOD | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.73% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $14M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.9% | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.43 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.13% | 19.69% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOOD and RULE
Explore further