Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MUSE vs CGMS

TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF

MUSE

TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF

Annual cost

0.56%

Fund size

$40M

CGMS

Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$4.9B

Key differences

Both MUSE and CGMS are fixed income ETFs. MUSE charges 0.56% a year and CGMS 0.39%. The main difference: MUSE follows a active selection strategy; CGMS uses index tracking.

  • MUSE follows a active selection strategy; CGMS uses index tracking.
  • MUSE covers emerging markets; CGMS covers North America.
  • CGMS costs 0.17% less per year.
  • CGMS is much larger than MUSE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

MUSECGMS
Annual cost (TER)0.56%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$40M$4.9B
Since20242022
Dividend yield7.65%6.08%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionemerging marketsnorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+7.8%+6.4%
CAGR 3YN/A+7.9%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.88
Volatility 1Y2.81%3.44%
Max drawdown-3.64%-4.08%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to MUSE and CGMS