Screener
MUSE vs FLXR
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF vs TCW Flexible Income ETF
Key differences
Both MUSE and FLXR are fixed income ETFs. MUSE charges 0.56% a year and FLXR 0.40%. The main difference: MUSE covers emerging markets; FLXR covers global markets.
- MUSE covers emerging markets; FLXR covers global markets.
- FLXR costs 0.16% less per year.
- FLXR is much larger than MUSE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLXR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUSE | FLXR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $40M | $3.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 7.65% | 5.71% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.8% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.81% | 2.28% |
| Max drawdown | -3.64% | -1.94% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.