Screener
NJNK vs CRUX
Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF vs Columbia Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CRUX costs 0.14% less per year.
- CRUX is significantly larger than NJNK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CRUX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NJNK | CRUX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 6.30% | 4.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.03% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.47% | -1.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NJNK and CRUX
Explore further