Screener
NTSI vs GDMN
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund vs WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
Key differences
- NTSI costs 0.19% less per year.
- NTSI is classified as mixed asset, while GDMN is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NTSI covers global markets; GDMN covers north america.
- NTSI follows a active selection strategy; GDMN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GDMN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| NTSI | GDMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $486M | $216M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 2.62% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.4% | +93.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | +58.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.02% | 61.26% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -52.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NTSI and GDMN
Explore further