Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

OND vs IWM

ProShares On-Demand ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF

OND

ProShares On-Demand ETF

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$4M

IWM

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$80.9B

Key differences

Both OND and IWM are equity ETFs. OND charges 0.58% a year and IWM 0.19%. The main difference: IWM costs 0.39% less per year.

  • IWM costs 0.39% less per year.
  • IWM is much larger than OND. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, IWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ONDIWM
Annual cost (TER)0.58%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$4M$80.9B
Since20212000
Dividend yield0.00%0.87%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y-13.0%+37.7%
CAGR 3Y+15.5%+18.8%
CAGR 5YN/A+5.8%
Sharpe 3Y0.620.75
Volatility 1Y20.69%19.55%
Max drawdown-59.02%-41.13%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to OND and IWM