Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ONLN vs REK

ProShares Online Retail ETF vs ProShares Short Real Estate

ONLN

ProShares Online Retail ETF

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$66M

REK

ProShares Short Real Estate

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$11M

Key differences

Both ONLN and REK are equity ETFs. ONLN charges 0.58% a year and REK 0.95%. The main difference: ONLN follows a index tracking strategy; REK uses inverse.

  • ONLN follows a index tracking strategy; REK uses inverse.
  • ONLN covers global markets; REK covers North America.
  • ONLN costs 0.37% less per year.
  • ONLN is much larger than REK. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, ONLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • REK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ONLNREK
Annual cost (TER)0.58%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$66M$11M
Since20182010
Dividend yield0.33%3.29%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyindex trackinginverse
CAGR 1Y+7.4%-3.6%
CAGR 3Y+22.0%-4.7%
CAGR 5Y-6.5%-0.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.76-0.41
Volatility 1Y23.81%13.64%
Max drawdown-71.77%-58.67%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ONLN and REK