Screener
ONLN vs ROM
ProShares Online Retail ETF vs ProShares Ultra Technology
Key differences
Both ONLN and ROM are equity ETFs. ONLN charges 0.58% a year and ROM 0.95%. The main difference: ONLN follows a index tracking strategy; ROM uses leveraged.
- ONLN follows a index tracking strategy; ROM uses leveraged.
- ONLN covers global markets; ROM covers North America.
- ONLN costs 0.37% less per year.
- ROM is much larger than ONLN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ONLN | ROM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $66M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 0.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | +120.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.0% | +52.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.5% | +28.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.81% | 44.31% |
| Max drawdown | -71.77% | -67.55% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.