Screener
ONLN vs UWM
ProShares Online Retail ETF vs ProShares Ultra Russell2000
Key differences
Both ONLN and UWM are equity ETFs. ONLN charges 0.58% a year and UWM 0.95%. The main difference: ONLN follows a index tracking strategy; UWM uses leveraged.
- ONLN follows a index tracking strategy; UWM uses leveraged.
- ONLN covers global markets; UWM covers North America.
- ONLN costs 0.37% less per year.
- UWM is much larger than ONLN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, UWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- UWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ONLN | UWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $66M | $249M |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | +73.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.0% | +26.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.5% | +1.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.81% | 38.76% |
| Max drawdown | -71.77% | -71.46% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.